<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>My Truden Life</title>
	<link>http://mnogo.truden.com</link>
	<description>I Am only Reminding You</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:23:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>Bertrand Russell&#8217;s theory of knowledge (I can not believe it&#8230;!)</title>
		<description>I won't say "I can not believe that you call him philosopher" because that will bring difficulties in understanding the meaning of "belief".
But I can say "Oh, my God!" and that will change nothing.

I don't like seriousness and in support of my statement I'll say - it sucks.

Now imagine that ...</description>
		<link>http://mnogo.truden.com/archives/186.html</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Bertrand Russell - knowledge and logic</title>
		<description>"Can human beings know anything, and if so, what and how? This question is really the most essentially philosophical of all questions." - Russell

Not being offensive to Russell’s logic I’d like to mark his question as illogical.
Such question should not be uttered if it puts in doubt the ability to ...</description>
		<link>http://mnogo.truden.com/archives/185.html</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Awareness beforehand</title>
		<description>The Concept

An existence is claimed only after observation.
Existence is state of presence in observation.
The mind changes the concept by applying "existence" to the object, forgetting that the "existence" derived from (and actually is) awareness about presence.
Awareness is needed in order to make the existence valid.

---

Explanation

We work with "existence" more like ...</description>
		<link>http://mnogo.truden.com/archives/184.html</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>50/50 (Clarification for Dummies)</title>
		<description>The main problem in understanding the concept "Awareness beforehand" is:
the mind do not pay attention to the fact that it works with meanings and concepts created after the observation.

Once an existence is registered in observation the "existence" concept is created and from then on the mind applies the existence to ...</description>
		<link>http://mnogo.truden.com/archives/183.html</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>50/50 (Point of Exit)</title>
		<description>The closing of topic 50/50 in Rational Responders

- - -

POINT OF EXIT

We are at the point of exit which comes with the end of the arguments.
I can expect more discussions on my statement, but there is no way to refute it.
Until you prove me wrong atheists don't have the right ...</description>
		<link>http://mnogo.truden.com/archives/182.html</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>50/50 (Part Three)</title>
		<description>Remember what I said? - The Spirit has one only property, the capability to observe.
Of course it has self-awareness (I exist).
Through observation the spirit creates knowledge: "I observe one object, and there is one more and they are moving closer to each other".
The knowledge "there is other existence except my ...</description>
		<link>http://mnogo.truden.com/archives/181.html</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>50/50 (Part Two)</title>
		<description>When I was in high school I got two points lower mark on physics test for saying that a dual particle (wave/matter) can not behave as wave if it is observed as particle. 
Today’s quantum physics question it the way I did.

In my opening of this topic I did not ...</description>
		<link>http://mnogo.truden.com/archives/180.html</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>50/50 (Part One)</title>
		<description>A week ago I had interesting conversation with the atheists on Facebook until the topic was deleted.
Fine, I said, it is not first time to delete my topic or comment. Just a week before that they deleted my comment from the first page of Mr. Dawkins web site.
A day latter ...</description>
		<link>http://mnogo.truden.com/archives/179.html</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Richard Dawkins DELUSION</title>
		<description>After I did my "Dawkins experiment" I decided to go back and have a real conversation with Mr Dawkins admirers (they wouldn't like the "followers" word).
So I decided to tell them about my God - the One who I know. (you have to be registered for this forum)
I wasn't impressed ...</description>
		<link>http://mnogo.truden.com/archives/177.html</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Dawkins experiment</title>
		<description>Yesterday (28.12.2007) I decided to do The Dawkins experiment
You might not see it as an experiment, but I call it like that, because if you set plan for research and study on a subject you are actually experimenting.
Do and observe.

So, what was the experiment?
I simply opened a topic in Richard ...</description>
		<link>http://mnogo.truden.com/archives/176.html</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
